DBMM Army List Book 2. «on: April 14, , PM». Can someone post a link to the Army List book 2 please as I’m having difficulty finding it. Thanks. DBMM ARMY LISTS BOOK 2 – THE CLASSICAL PERIOD, BC TO AD COMPILED AND EDITED BY PHIL BARKER These lists are intended for use with . DBMM Army Lists: BC to AD Bk. 2 [Phil Barker] on *FREE* Author interviews, book reviews, editors picks, and more. Read it now.
|Published (Last):||15 September 2017|
|PDF File Size:||19.28 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||7.41 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
I’ll be highly disappointed if the Scots Common pike aren’t classified as regular after Maverick, The scotts common only has one change that I can find, the feudal archers: The book contained almost lists. Each of the 64 army lists details troop types and numbers to allow the wargamer to recreate realistic armies that faithfully reflect the composition of their real-life prototypes.
It’s basically a reprint from what I can see. I don’t want to risk breaching copyright but does anyone know of an on-line list of the lists that have changed — if you see what I mean? They are nigh on the same as the first MM army lists with some minor changes.
De Bellis Magistrorum Militum (dbmm) Army Lists Book 2 500 BC to 476 AD
Enough of a change for me to at least buy book 4. From what I’ve seen so far I don’t think it’s worth buying the new lists if you have the old ones.
The main purpose of what Duncan is bbook is to give the differences in the old lists, vs the newly released ones. The cost differential has changed so the regulars are more expensive now.
Also remind me again who asked the convention dbmmm to return the tables vook were going to use for your MM games at Lancaster and told you who had them please? The result of extensive research, this revised and updated edition of Book 3 spans the early medieval period from AD to AD and covers armies from Europe, Asia, the Americas, the Middle East, and Africa.
The impetuous movement rules are generally considered much simpler. As Drusilla says I’m sure some lists have become better with ‘excellent nuances’ which not one single person has praised on the yahoo MM list but when people on the MM list themselves start calling changes ‘dubious’, with new troop types that aren’t cover in boom rules no one is sure of how to treat the new Bw X dvmm Bw I behindbasic misprints with the Roman general Sulla in AD not BC is a bit obvious, I never said they had many errors just as Duncan head himself says as well that they had errors, then again it must be because I’m a heretic where you get the MM view of the world us good everyone else bad.
Don’t listen to some, as the number of mistakes is minimal. I don’t think it breaks copyright but am not an expert.
Each of the 85 army lists details troop types and boook to allow the wargamer to recreate realistic armies that faithfully reflect the composition of bokk real-life prototypes. The latest rules have differentiated the combat outcomes for irregular BwS and regular BwS. I know another list someone is Lh s in vook own home list but is only Lh o in others where they are acting as mercs. It’s the one with the puzzled Viking on the cover, and the DBA cover Roman on the inside front cover.
Maverick I will take a quick look at the scots list later and let you know. For instance the Visigothic list is now called Gothic, that’s about the flavour of the changes, all that input by a lot of different people and nothing really changed, still has a bunch of typos according to the people on the MM yahoo list.
DBMM Army Lists Book 2: BC to AD | Board Game | BoardGameGeek
That’s highly disappointing and I probably won’t be buying the new book then, greatly appreciated for checking Aynsley. At the time the only WRG army lists were the few in the purple primer. I have a copy. People, here are a list of a ‘ few’ more errors in book one so far link I’m not opposed to MM Drusilla unless you can show me where I’ve done so in this thread, as I’ve said constantly in the past I don’t care who plays what it’s just the ‘well this is far superior to other ancient games as it flows much better as its so elegant compared to others’ comments from MM players.
A must for competition games, DBMM Army Lists Book 2 also provides an invaluable general reference source for the troop types and organization of armies of the period. The HYW English lost the Bw s in the main list it got moved to a before of after 13 something and some other minor Bw s numbers changed from to per Kn something or the other way around, apart from some Bw s numbers etc.
I’m going to be making up an errata list of changes from Duncan’s for my guys here to put in their old MM lists, as the errors and changes aren’t that different. Accompanying each list are historical notes providing in-depth commentary on the troops involved along with information on naval units, terrain and climate. Accompanying each list are historical notes providing in depth commentary on the troops involved along with information on naval units, terrain and climate.
Book three errors and changes, I also find it interesting that Duncan himself says some of the changes seem dubious. The rules are fantastic and once you know them, give the best ancients game around. Catavar, I just looked at Duncan’s list of book 3, he makes no mention of Burmese or early Tang so one assumes no changes.
Over army lists are also available, detailing forces throughout the period and across the world.
De Bellis Magistrorum Militum (dbmm) Army Lists Book 2 BC to AD | eBay
Not sure though that DBMM can withstand any more complexity did Phil also at last cut some fat out of other areas of the rules? The result of extensive research, this revised and updated edition of Book 2 spans the classical period of warfare from BC to AD and covers armies from Europe, Asia, the Middle East, and Africa.
It was far ahead of it’s time with the mechanisms it used. Interesting change — I’ve been advocating something like it for years. Will let you guys know what the changes are, but as I said from what they have been saying on the MM yahoo list it isn’t much at all which has got some a trifle unhappy over there.
Anything else you need me to look at? But there was so much noise on the DBMM “playtest” list that it was hard to get heard.
All members in good standing are free to post here. I’ve heard similar comments about the similarity between the 1st and 2nd editions from two gamers who have bought the new lists.
Haven’t read the rules in a very long time, not since they first came out. My personal advice is to just wait for Duncan’s errata of changes and errors of all the books, that will save people a lot of money for basic little changes, which some don’t seem to like being mentioned for some reason, oh well takes all sorts I suppose.
Drusilla I have never made personal negative comments about anyone or what they playand that sir is unsporting of you. Life is strange that way.